Decisions on Inclusion in the Swedish Basic Health Care Package—Roles of Cost-Effectiveness and Need

Health Care Analysis 11 (4):301-308 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Background: Inclusion or not of a treatment strategy in the publicly financed health care is really a matter of prioritisation. In Sweden priority setting decisions are governed by law in which it is stated that decisions should be guided by firstly the principle of need and secondly the principle of cost-effectiveness

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care.Mary Ann Baily - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):172-182.
Who should manage care? The case for providers.John D. Stobo - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):387-389.
Impartiality and disability discrimination.Greg Bognar - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (1):1-23.
Just Caring: Defining a Basic Benefit Package.L. M. Fleck - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (6):589-611.
An Integrated Approach to Resource Allocation.Louise M. Terry - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (2):171-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
37 (#419,437)

6 months
14 (#170,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Just Health Care.Norman Daniels - 1985 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The principles of morals and legislation.Jeremy Bentham - 1988 - Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
The collected works of John Stuart Mill.John Stuart Mill - 2006 - Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund.

Add more references