Earman and Norton on Supertasks That Generate Indeterminism

In a recent discussion, Earman and Norton [(1998)] propose a classification of supertasks that generate indeterminism which is flawed. An emendation is presented here.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,071
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Discussion. Earman and Norton on Supertasks That Generate Indeterminism.JP Laraudogoitia - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):137-141.
An Interesting Fallacy Concerning Dynamical Supertasks.Pérez Laraudogoitia Jon - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):321-334.
Supertasks, Dynamical Attractors and Indeterminism.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (4):724-731.
On Norton's Dome.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 2013 - Synthese 190 (14):2925-2941.
Information-Theoretic Statistical Mechanics Without Landauer's Principle.D. Parker - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (4):831-856.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

3 ( #672,607 of 2,132,826 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #389,585 of 2,132,826 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums