Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (6):378-379 (2020)

Abstract
Interest in the use of medical data for health research is increasing. Yet, as Elizabeth Ford and colleagues rightly note, there are open questions about the suitability of existing ethical and regulatory oversight frameworks for these research approaches. In their feature article, ‘Should free text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizen’s jury study in the United Kingdom’, Ford et al report the results of a deliberative engagement study in which 18 members of the public were asked whether and under what conditions free text data from medical records should be shared for research purposes. The authors’ explicit aim was to inform national policy on sharing medical text. Public attitudes—stated otherwise, the attitudes of patients whose medical information will ultimately be used under any data sharing policy—are a necessary input into ethical and regulatory decision-making about use of medical data for health research. Though public attitudes will rarely be determinative, they must be weighed in order to uphold the ethical principle of respect for persons.1 Ford et al ’s article is, therefore, an important contribution to …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-106184
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Relationship Between Normative Claims and Empirical Realities in Immigration.Joseph H. Carens - 2019 - Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface Between Empirical Research and Normative Analysisandquot;.
Empirical and Armchair Ethics.Greg Bognar - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (4):467-482.
Preferences in Their Place.J. Lenman - 2000 - Environmental Values 9 (4):431-451.
Empirical Methods in Animal Ethics.Kirsten Persson & David Shaw - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (5):853-866.
Introduction: Why Should We Study Migration Policies at the Interface Between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis?Matthias Hoesch & Lena Laube - 2019 - Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface Between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”.
Ethics, Law, Technology and Policymaking: An Editorial.Anthony Cutter & Bert Gordijn - 2009 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 3 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-27

Total views
7 ( #1,071,959 of 2,519,863 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,863 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes