Dialogue 42 (1):107- (2003)

Robert A. Larmer
University of New Brunswick
In "Miracles as Evidence Against the Existence of God," (’Southern Journal of Philosophy’, 1985) Christine Overall argued that the occurrence of miracles would constitute evidence against the existence of God, on the grounds that miracles are violations of natural law or permanently inexplicable events and, as such, would be inconsistent with the supposed purposes of God. In ’Water Into Wine?’ (MacGill-Queen’s, 1988), I argued that her argument fails once a more adequate definition of miracle is adopted. In "Miracles and God: A Reply to Robert A.H. Larmer" (’Dialogue’ 1997), Overall attempted to reply to my specific criticisms and to attack central theses of ’Water Into Wine?’. I argue that she is successful in neither endeavor
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0012-2173
DOI 10.1017/s0012217300004224
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,247
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Miracles as Evidence Against the Existence of God.Christine Overall - 1985 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):347-353.
"Miracle" and "Paradox".Alastair McKinnon - 1967 - American Philosophical Quarterly 4 (4):308-314.
Miracles As Evidence Against The Existence of God.Christine Overall - 1985 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):347-353.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Miracles and Larmer.Christine Overall - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (1):123-136.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
71 ( #150,584 of 2,448,517 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #304,192 of 2,448,517 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes