International Philosophical Quarterly 26 (September):277-85 (1986)
One of the major reasons underlying the widespread rejection of the theory that the mind is an immaterial substance distinct from the body, But which nevertheless acts on the body, Is that it is felt that such a theory commits one to denying the principle of the conservation of energy. My aim in this article is to assess the strength of this objection. My thesis is that the usual replies are inadequate, But--Strong as this objection appears--Some important logical distinctions have been overlooked and when these are taken into account its force vanishes
|Keywords||Body Energy Metaphysics Minds|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
The Ki Process: Korean Secrets for Cultivating Dynamic Energy.Scott Shaw - 1997 - S. Weiser.
'Speed of Light -A Fundamental Retrospection to Prospection'.Narendra Katkar - 2011 - Journal of American Science 7 (5):16.
Is the Conservation of Energy Proved of the Human Body?W. H. Sheldon - 1921 - Journal of Philosophy 18 (22):589-600.
Closure Principles and the Laws of Conservation of Energy and Momentum.Sophie Gibb - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (3):363-384.
Energy Conservation in GTR.C. Hoefer - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (2):187-199.
Parallelism, Interactionism, and Causation.Laird Addis - 1984 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9 (1):329-344.
Mind-Body Interactionism in Light of the Parapsychological Evidence.John Beloff - 1976 - Theoria to Theory 10 (May):125-37.
Does Interactionism Violate a Law of Classical Physics?Edward W. Averill & Bernard Keating - 1981 - Mind 90 (January):102-7.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads129 ( #36,565 of 2,158,385 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #41,493 of 2,158,385 )
How can I increase my downloads?