Shoemaker on Moore's Paradox and Self-Knowledge

Philosophical Studies 96 (3):239-252 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Shoemaker argues that a satisfactory resolution of Moore's paradox requires a _self-intimation thesis that posits a "constitutive relation between belief and believing that one believes." He claims that such a thesis is needed to explain the crucial fact that the assent conditions for '_P' entail those for '_I believe that P'. This paper argues for an alternative resolution of Moore's paradox that provides for an adequate explanation of the crucial fact without relying on the kind of necessary connection between first and second-order beliefs that is posited by Shoemaker's self-intimation thesis

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,554

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#334,292)

6 months
17 (#260,151)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Two concepts of consciousness.David M. Rosenthal - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (May):329-59.
The First Person Perspective and Other Essays.Sydney Shoemaker - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The First Person Perspective and Other Essays.Sydney Shoemaker - 1996 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 59 (2):378-378.
Moore’s paradox and self-knowledge.Sydney Shoemaker - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (2-3):211-28.
On knowing one’s own mind.Sydney Shoemaker - 1988 - Philosophical Perspectives 2:183-209.

View all 6 references / Add more references