Think 4 (10):31-33 (2005)

In Issue 7 of Think, Brendan Larvor criticised the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, for suggesting that atheism and humanism ought not to be taught in schools alongside the religious faiths. In Issue 9, Brenda Watson defended the Archbishop's view. Here, Larvor replies to Watson. The numbers below refer to numbered points in Watson's piece.
Keywords Education  Religion  Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1477175600001160
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,018
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Tu Quoque, Archbishop.Brendan Larvor - 2004 - Think 3 (7):101-108.
The Philosophy of Christian Religious Education.Brenda Watson & Jeff Astley - 1995 - British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (2):242.
Priorities in Religious Education.Brenda Watson - 1993 - British Journal of Educational Studies 41 (3):303-303.
Reply to James Blachowicz.Brendan Larvor - 1999 - The Owl of Minerva 31 (1):53-54.
Has Education Taken a Wrong Turn?Brenda Watson - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 40:32-35.
Reply by Margaret J. Osler and Richard A. Watson.Margaret J. Osler & Richard A. Watson - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):407-407.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #216,815 of 2,324,073 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #688,650 of 2,324,073 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes