The noema in Husserl's phenomenology

Husserl Studies 3 (3):209-230 (1986)
Mary Jeanne Larrabee
DePaul University
Husserl's theory of the noema has precipitated much controversy, Especially following follesdal's 1969 paper, Yet many issues remain unsolved. This paper outlines aspects of method and experience relevant to a theory of noema, Describes various uses of the term 'noema' and thus sorts out two different levels of usage, And shows how this interpretation avoids difficulties raised by other commentators, Particularly in regard to maintaining a clear distinction between perceptual and linguistic experiences and their correlative noemata
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00211005
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,954
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Phenomenology: Neither Auto- nor Hetero- Be.John J. Drummond - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):57-74.
The Transcendental and the Psychological.John J. Drummond - 2008 - Husserl Studies 24 (3):193-204.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
73 ( #89,721 of 2,293,883 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #18,213 of 2,293,883 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature