Which Orphans Will Find a Home? The Rule of Rescue in Resource Allocation for Rare Diseases

Hastings Center Report 42 (1):27-34 (2012)

Abstract
The rule of rescue describes the moral impulse to save identifiable lives in immediate danger at any expense. Think of the extremes taken to rescue a small child who has fallen down a well, a woman pinned beneath the rubble of an earthquake, or a submarine crew trapped on the ocean floor. No effort is deemed too great. Yet should this same moral instinct to rescue, regardless of cost, be applied in the emergency room, the hospital, or the community clinic? In health care, the desire to save lives at any cost must be reconciled with the reality of resource scarcity. As one example, the estimated cost for prophylactic Factor VIII to treat one patient with hemophilia for one year is $300,000. Costs of this magnitude have been accepted by public and private insurers in the developed world, even though, in principle, these sums could provide greater overall health benefit if allocated to pay for the unmet health care needs of many other patients. Looking forward, however, broad application of the rule of rescue will be increasingly untenable. But the moral instinct will remain: the desire to help those weakest among us, especially when their small numbers allow us to see them as unique individuals. What, then, is the ethical framework that can guide coverage and reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs into the future?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/hast.12
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,692
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Equality and Priority.Derek Parfit - 1997 - Ratio 10 (3):202–221.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What Is the Value of Three-Parent IVF?Tina Rulli - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (4):38-47.
Rescuing the Duty to Rescue.Tina Rulli & Joseph Millum - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics:1-5.
Health Care Organizations and the Power of Procedure.Emily A. Largent - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):51-53.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neurotrauma and the Rule of Rescue.S. Honeybul, G. R. Gillett, K. M. Ho & C. R. P. Lind - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):707-710.
The Problem with Rescue Medicine.N. S. Jecker - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):64-81.
Ethical and Social Aspects on Rare Diseases.Dusanka Krajnovic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (4):32-48.
An Integrated Approach to Resource Allocation.Louise M. Terry - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (2):171-180.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
24 ( #319,955 of 2,327,792 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #79,825 of 2,327,792 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature