Common Nouns as Variables: Evidence from Conservativity and the Temperature Paradox

In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21. pp. 731-746 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Common nouns and noun phrases have usually been analyzed semantically as predicates. In quantified sentences, these predicates take variables as arguments. This paper develops and defends an analysis in which common nouns and noun phrases themselves are treated as variables, rather than as predicates taking variables as arguments. Several apparent challenges for this view will be addressed, including the modal non-rigidity of common nouns. Two major advantages to treating common nouns as variables will be presented: Such an analysis predicts that all nominal quantification is conservative, rather than requiring conservativity to be stipulated as a constraint on determiner denotations; and it makes possible some improvements to the analysis of the temperature paradox, allowing for quantificational examples without adding a spurious layer of modal variability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logic and Common Nouns.Peter M. Simons - 1978 - Analysis 38 (4):161 - 167.
Mass Terms.Brendan S. Gillon - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (10):712-730.
Count Nouns and Mass Nouns.H. W. Noonan - 1978 - Analysis 38 (4):167-172.
Language and ontology in early chinese thought.Chris Fraser - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (4):420-456.
Mass nouns and plural logic.David Nicolas - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (2):211-244.
The Semantics of Nouns.Zhengdao Ye (ed.) - 2017 - Oxford University Press.
Count Nouns - Mass Nouns, Neat Nouns - Mess Nouns.Fred Landman - 2011 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6:12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-03

Downloads
16 (#770,883)

6 months
4 (#315,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Nathan Lasersohn
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Citations of this work

Conceptual evaluation: epistemic.Alejandro Pérez Carballo - 2020 - In Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen & David Plunkett (eds.), Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 304-332.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references