New features for old: Creation or derivation?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):31-32 (1998)
Schyns, Goldstone & Thibaut oppose the notion of fixed feature analysis, suggesting the possibility of flexible feature creation in object recognition and categorisation. Such proposals cannot be assessed until clear definitions of the objects in question and their decompositions are formulated. Flexibility may come from the decompositions of objects rather than from feature creation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X98410100
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,831
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
8 ( #540,222 of 2,214,215 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #410,028 of 2,214,215 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature