On Scepticism About Personal Identity Thought Experiments

Analytic Philosophy 1 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many philosophers have become sceptical of the use of thought experiments in theorising about personal identity. In large part this is due to work in experimental philosophy that appears to confirm long held philosophical suspicions that thought experiments elicit inconsistent judgements about personal identity, and hence judgements that are thought to be the product of cognitive biases. If so, these judgements appear to be useless at informing our theories of personal identity. Using the methods of experimental philosophy, we investigate whether people exhibit inconsistent judgements and, if they do, whether these judgements are likely to be the source of cognitive bias or, instead, sensitivity to some relevant factor. We do not find that people’s judgements are sensitive to any of the factors we investigate (relevant or irrelevant), nor that people have inconsistent judgements across cases. Rather, people’s judgements are best explained by them having a very minimal account of what it takes for a person to survive. Since this pattern of judgements is no reason to think that we are subject to cognitive bias, we see no reason, as things stand, to be sceptical of our judgements.

Similar books and articles

Substance and the Concept of Personal Identity.Jens Kipper - 2016 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 3.
Critical Notice of Peter Unger's Identity, Consciousness and Value.Carol Rovane - 1994 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):119-133.
Back to the self and the future.S. Beck - 1998 - South African Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):211-225.
Should We Tolerate People Who Split?Simon Beck - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):1-17.
Should we tolerate people who split?Simon Beck - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):1-17.
Reconsidering a transplant: A response to Wagner.Simon Beck - 2016 - South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):132-140.
Thought experiments and personal identity.Stephen Coleman - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 98 (1):51-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-17

Downloads
275 (#74,513)

6 months
109 (#39,954)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andrew James Latham
Aarhus University
Kristie Miller
University of Sydney
1 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Mind 93 (371):450-455.
Survey-Driven Romanticism.Simon Cullen - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):275-296.
The Constitution of Selves.Christopher Williams & Marya Schechtman - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (4):641.

View all 17 references / Add more references