Sophia 53 (3):389-395 (2014)

In his recent article in Sophia, Benedikt Paul Göcke concluded that ‘as long as we do not have a sound argument entailing the necessity of the world, panentheism is not an attractive alternative to classical theism’ : 75). As the article progresses, Göcke clarifies his view of what panentheism is, essentially identical to Göcke’s view of classical theism in every way, except in the world’s modal relation to God. This concept is vastly different to many of the panentheistic notions that are more commonly held. While it is not initially made transparent—especially with the label Göcke chooses to use—it becomes increasingly clear that Göcke critiques a God concept of his own making. More common variations of panentheism are contrasted with Göcke’s version, in order to provide a broader and more accurate view of the ancient concept, and to demonstrate that Göcke’s view of panentheism is idiosyncratic. It is finally explained that even if Göcke’s view of panentheism were definitive, he has not successfully argued for the relative unattractiveness of the concept, relative to his view of classical theism
Keywords Panentheism  Göcke  Pantheism  Theism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-014-0436-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Panentheisms East and West.Philip Clayton - 2010 - Sophia 49 (2):183-191.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Panentheism: What It Is and Is Not.Raphael Lataster & Purushottama Bilimoria - 2018 - Journal of World Philosophies 3 (2):49-64.
Hunky Panentheism.Roberto Rodighiero - 2019 - Sophia 58 (4):581-596.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wissenschaft Ist Panentheismus.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2011 - In Göcke Benedikt Paul & Wasmaier-Sailer Margit (eds.), Idealismus und natürliche Theologie. Verlag Karl Alber.
Reply to Raphael Latester.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2014 - Sophia 53 (3):397-400.
Models of God.Ted Peters - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):273-288.
Physicalism Quaerens Intellectum.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2008 - Philosophical Forum 39 (4):463-468.
After Physicalism.Benedikt Paul Göcke (ed.) - 2012 - The University of Notre Dame Press.
How to Heckle Swinburne on God and Time.Benedikt Paul Göcke, Matthias Hoesch & Peter Rohs - 2008 - In Nicola Mößner, Sebastian Schmoranzer & Christian Weidemann (eds.), Richard Swinburne. Christian Philosophy in a Modern World. ontos.


Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #301,067 of 2,520,424 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,424 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes