The Conceptual Impossibility of Free Will Error Theory


Authors
Andrew James Latham
University of Sydney (PhD)
Abstract
This paper argues for a view of free will that I will call the conceptual impossibility of the truth of free will error theory - the conceptual impossibility thesis. I will argue that given the concept of free will we in fact deploy, it is impossible for our free will judgements - judgements regarding whether some action is free or not - to be systematically false. Since we do judge many of our actions to be free, it follows from the conceptual impossibility thesis that many of our actions are in fact free. Hence it follows that free will error theory - the view that no judgement of the form ‘action A was performed freely’ - is false. I will show taking seriously the conceptual impossibility thesis helps makes good sense of some seemingly inconsistent results in recent experimental philosophy work on determinism and our concept of free will. Further, I will present some reasons why we should expect to find similar results for every other factor we might have thought was important for free will.
Keywords free will  error theory  conceptual impossibility  conditional concept  experimental philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Free Will Remains a Mystery.Peter van Inwagen - 2000 - Philosophical Perspectives 14:1-20.
Indirect Compatibilism.Andrew James Latham - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Sydney
Experimental Philosophy on Free Will: An Error Theory for Incompatibilist Intuitions.Eddy Nahmias & Dylan Murray - 2010 - In Jesus Aguilar, Andrei Buckareff & Keith Frankish (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Action. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 189--215.
Locke on the Freedom of the Will.Vere Chappell - 1994 - In G. A. J. Rogers (ed.), Locke's Philosophy: Content and Context. Oxford University Press. pp. 101--21.
Free Will Eliminativism: Reference, Error, and Phenomenology.Gregg D. Caruso - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2823-2833.
Free Will Eliminativism: Reference, Error, and Phenomenology.Kevin Timpe - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2823-2833.
Fate, Freedom and Contingency.Ferenc Huoranszki - 2002 - Acta Analytica 17 (1):79-102.
Should or Should Not Forensic Psychiatrists Think About Free Will?Gerben Meynen - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (2):203-212.
Free Will and the Burden of Proof: William G. Lycan.William G. Lycan - 2003 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 53:107-122.
Free Acts and Robot Cats.Russell Daw & Torin Alter - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 102 (3):345-57.
Free Will and Luck.Alfred R. Mele - 2006 - Oxford University Press USA.
Experimental Evidence for Free Will Revisionism.Chris Weigel - 2013 - Philosophical Explorations 16 (1):31 - 43.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-10

Total views
31 ( #264,708 of 2,249,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #23,881 of 2,249,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature