Vulnerability Ethics, Abortion, and Organ Donation

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (2):300-306 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Emily Carroll and Parker Crutchfield published a paper entitled, “The Duty to Protect, Abortion, and Organ Donation.” They argued that a prohibition on abortion is morally equivalent to a positive mandate for parents to donate organs to their children and that opponents of abortion must be prepared to accept these mandates to remain consistent.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Welfare, Abortion, and Organ Donation: A Reply to the Restrictivist.Emily Carroll & Parker Crutchfield - 2024 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (2):290-295.
The Duty to Protect, Abortion, and Organ Donation.Emily Carroll & Parker Crutchfield - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (3):333-343.
Restrictivism, Abortion, and Organ Donation.William Simkulet - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (3):348-354.
Vulnerability, Autonomy, and the Living Organ Donor.Christy Simpson - 2023 - Hastings Center Report 53 (1):46-47.
Trust and the Duty of Organ Donation.Ben Almassi - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (6):275-283.
Organ Donation after Euthanasia.Frans J. van Ittersum & Lambert Hendriks - 2012 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12 (3):431-437.
Imminent Death Donation: Ethical and Practical Policy Considerations.Jordan Potter - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (2):524-537.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-15

Downloads
19 (#822,759)

6 months
18 (#152,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references