A failed cassatio? A note on Valor and Martinez on Goldstein

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3pt3):383-386 (2010)
I address the claim by Valor and Martínez that Goldstein's cassationist approach to Liar-like paradoxes generates paradoxes it cannot solve. I argue that these authors miss an essential point in Goldstein's cassationist approach, namely the thesis that paradoxical sentences are not able to make the statement they seem to make.
Keywords Liar  Tokenism  Cassationism
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,479
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Laureano Luna (2010). A FailedCassatio? A Note on Valor and Martínez on Goldstein. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3pt3):383-386.
Laurence Goldstein (2000). A Unified Solution to Some Paradoxes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):53–74.
Albert A. Johnstone (2002). The Liar Syndrome. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):37-55.
Gary Mar & Paul St Denis (1999). What the Liar Taught Achilles. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index


Total downloads


Recent downloads (6 months)


How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.