Public Choice 1 (172):175-192 (2017)

Authors
Ben Laurence
University of Chicago
Abstract
This paper explores ethical issues raised by quadratic voting. We compare quadratic voting to majority voting from two ethical perspectives: the perspective of utilitarianism and that of democratic theory. From a utilitarian standpoint, the comparison is ambiguous: if voter preferences are independent of wealth, then quadratic voting out- performs majority voting, but if voter preferences are polarized by wealth, then majority voting may be superior. From the standpoint of democratic theory, we argue that assess- ments in terms of efficiency are too narrow. Voting institutions and political institutions more generally face a legitimacy requirement. We argue that in the presence of inequalities of wealth, any vote buying mechanism, including quadratic voting, will have a difficult time meeting this requirement.
Keywords Quadratic Voting  Democratic Theory  Voting
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Capitalism and Freedom.Milton Friedman - 1962 - Ethics 74 (1):70-72.
Social Choice and Individual Values.Kenneth Joseph Arrow - 1951 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley: New York.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Voting Methods.Eric Pacuit - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Strategic Voting Under Uncertainty About the Voting Method.Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit - 2019 - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 297:252–272.
Plural Voting and Political Equality: A Thought Experiment in Democratic Theory.Trevor Latimer - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 17 (1):1474885115591344.
Sincerity and Manipulation Under Approval Voting.Ulle Endriss - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):335-355.
Voting (Insincerely) in Corporate Law.Zohar Goshen - 2001 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2 (2).
Voting Procedures.Michael Dummett - 1984 - Oxford University Press UK.
Is Compulsory Voting Justified?Annabelle Lever - 2009 - Public Reason 1 (1):57-74.
A Procedural Model of Voting.Sven Ove Hansson - 1992 - Theory and Decision 32 (3):269-301.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-10-21

Total views
4 ( #1,251,152 of 2,454,629 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,377 of 2,454,629 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes