g−2 and the Trust in Experimental Results


Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/s1355-2198(98)00032-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,796
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Casimir Effect and the Interpretation of the Vacuum.S. E. Rugh, H. Zinkernagel & T. Y. Cao - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30 (1):111-139.
"When" Do Scientists Prefer to Vary Their Experiments?H. M. Collins - 1984 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (2):169.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem.Svend E. Rugh & Henrik Zinkernagel - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (4):663-705.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Trust: A Temporary Human Attachment Facilitated by Oxytocin.Paul J. Zak - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):368-369.
Trust: Self-Interest and the Common Good.Marek Kohn - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Trustworthiness is a Social Norm, but Trusting is Not.C. Bicchieri, E. Xiao & R. Muldoon - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):170-187.
Creating Trust.Robert C. Solomon - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
42 ( #188,628 of 2,244,032 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #86,802 of 2,244,032 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature