Is banning direct to consumer advertising of prescription medicine justified paternalism?

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (2):69-74 (2005)
Abstract
New Zealand is one of two OECD countries in the world where direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medicine (DTCA-PM) is permitted. Increase in such activity in recent years has resulted in a disproportionate increase in dispensary volume of heavily advertised medicines. Concern for the potential harm to healthcare consumers and the public healthcare system has prompted the medical profession to call for a ban on DTCA-PM as the best way of protecting the public interest. Such blanket prohibition however also interferes with the public’s right of access to information. This paper will examine if banning DTCA-PM would constitute a justified form of paternalism in the context of today’s New Zealand.
Keywords Drug industry  advertising  public policy  ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1007/BF02448845
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,829
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
What's Wrong with "Deceptive" Advertising?Daniel Attas - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 21 (1):49-59.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

54 ( #98,275 of 2,178,184 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #54,675 of 2,178,184 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums