PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:347 - 354 (1986)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
For positivists and post-positivists alike, methodology had a decidedly suspect status. Positivists saw methodological rules as stipulative conventions, void of any empirical content. Post-positivists (especially naturalistic ones) see such rules as mere descriptions of how research is conducted, carrying no normative force. It is argued here that methodological rules are fundamentally empirical claims, but ones which have significant normative bite. Methodology is thus divorced both from foundationalism and conventionalism.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Laudan's Normative Naturalism.Harvey Siegel - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):295.
Blurred Boundaries: Recent Changes in the Relationship Between Economics and the Philosophy of Natural Science.D. Wade Hands - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (5):751-772.
History and Philosophy of Science: Coherent Programme at Last?: Seymour Mauskopf and Tad Schmaltz : Integrating History and Philosophy of Science: Problems and Prospects. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 263. Heidelberg: Springer, 249pp, €99.95. [REVIEW]Samuel Schindler - 2013 - Metascience 22 (2):457-460.
Similar books and articles
Progress and Rationality: Laudan's Attempt to Divorce a Happy Couple.Matthias Kaiser - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):433-455.
Methodology, Epistemology and Conventions: Popper's Bad Start.John Preston - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:314 - 322.
The Empirical Character of Methodological Rules.Warren Schmaus - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):106.
Normative Naturalism and the Relativised a Priori.Dan McArthur - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (2):331 - 350.
A Revision of the Neoclassical Economics Methodology.Geert Reuten - 1996 - Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (1):39-68.
Normative Naturalism and the Role of Philosophy.Alexander Rosenberg - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):34-43.
The Methodology of Maurice Hauriou: Legal, Sociological, Philosophical.Christopher B. Gray - 2010 - Rodopi.
Poincaré's Conventionalism and the Logical Positivists.Michael Friedman - 1995 - Foundations of Science 1 (2):299-314.
Methodology Might Matter, but Weintraub's Meta-Methodology Shouldn't.Uskali Mäki - 1994 - Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):215-232.
Are Methodological Rules Hypothetical Imperatives?David B. Resnik - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):498-507.
Do Scientific Aims Justify Methodological Rules?David B. Resnik - 1993 - Erkenntnis 38 (2):223 - 232.
Laudan, Friedman and the Role of the A Priori in Science.Dan McArthur - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:169-190.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-05-29
Total views
28 ( #375,141 of 2,419,962 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,808 of 2,419,962 )
2011-05-29
Total views
28 ( #375,141 of 2,419,962 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,808 of 2,419,962 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads