Nonconceptual contents vs nonconceptual states

Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):23-43 (2005)
Daniel Laurier
Université de Montréal
The question to be discussed is whether the distinction between the conceptual and the nonconceptual is best understood as pertaining primarily to intentional contents or to intentional states or attitudes. Some authors have suggested that it must be understood in the second way, in order to make the claim that experiences are nonconceptual compatible with the idea that one can also believe what one experiences. I argue that there is no need to do so, and that a conceptual content can be understood as being simply one which is composed of concepts, without compromising this intuitive view of the relation between beliefs and experiences.
Keywords Believability  Concept  Content  Epistemology  State
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2005
DOI 10.1163/18756735-068001002
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 36,003
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Non-Conceptualism and the Problem of Perceptual Self-Knowledge.Robert Hanna & Monima Chadha - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):184-223.
Compositionality, Iconicity, and Perceptual Nonconceptualism.Josefa Toribio - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (2):177-193.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
54 ( #120,694 of 2,295,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #412,678 of 2,295,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature