Abstract
English philosopher Michael Oakeshott (1901-90) called himself a skeptic at various times, and yet his writings reveal little or no engagement with either of the major Hellenistic skeptical traditions, Pyrrhonism and Academic skepticism. Although he argued that the best way to understand ourselves is to look at the mirror of our intellectual inheritance, he did not look at this one. Furthermore, commentators on Oakeshott’s skepticism have also ignored these traditions and his possible place in them. This article explores these lacunae, seeking possible reasons for such neglect in the history of the modern reception of Hellenistic skepticism. Oakeshott and his commentators may have ignored the traditions of skepticism out of ignorance, lack of respect for their intellectual acuity, or fear of their moral consequences. Finally, this article sketches some of the benefits that might have been gained if Oakeshott and his commentators had paid more attention to these traditions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1474885105048048
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,617
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Michael Oakeshott’s Skepticism.Davide Orsi - 2015 - The European Legacy 20 (6):575-590.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-01

Total views
10 ( #814,919 of 2,348,912 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #238,452 of 2,348,912 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes