Analysis 57 (1):60-66 (1997)

Authors
Eric Margolis
University of British Columbia
Stephen Laurence
University of Sheffield
Abstract
The Language of Thought Hypothesis is often taken to have the fatal flaw that it generates an explanatory regress. The language of thought is invoked to explain certain features of natural language (e.g., that it is learned, understood, and is meaningful), but, according to the regress argument, the language of thought itself has these same features and hence no explanatory progress has been made. We argue that such arguments rely on the tacit assumption that the entire motivation for the language of thought consists in explaining the explanandum that allegedly generates the regress. But this tacit assumption is simply false. The Language of Thought Hypothesis is a cogent view and one with considerable explanatory advantages.
Keywords Regress argument  Language of thought  Metaphysics  Mind  mental representation  Wittgenstein  Crane, T  Fodor, J  propositional attitude
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00051
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,138
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Review of P Sychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning In the Philosophy of Mind.Jay L. Garfield - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1):235-240.
The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Language of Thought Hypothesis.Murat Aydede - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Languages of Thought.Lawrence J. Kaye - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (1):92-110.
I Don't Think So: Pinker on the Mentalese Monopoly.David J. Cole - 1999 - Philosophical Psychology 12 (3):283-295.
Concepts, Connectionism, and the Language of Thought.Martin Davies - 1991 - In W Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 485-503.
Thought, Language, and Animals.Hans-Johann Glock - 2006 - In Michael Kober (ed.), Grazer Philosophische Studien. Rodopi. pp. 139-160.
Wittgenstein on Rules and Practices.Mark McCullagh - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:83-100.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
330 ( #23,885 of 2,411,721 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #244,463 of 2,411,721 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes