Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Visual Bioethics”

American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):2-3 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although images are pervasive in public policy debates in bioethics, few who work in the field attend carefully to the way that images function rhetorically. If the use of images is discussed at all, it is usually to dismiss appeals to images as a form of manipulation. Yet it is possible to speak meaningfully of visual arguments. Examining the appeal to images of the embryo and fetus in debates about abortion and stem cell research, I suggest that bioethicists would be well served by attending much more carefully to how images function in public policy debates.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to open Peer commentaries on “why treat the wounded?”.Michael L. Gross - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):W1 – W3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
19 (#803,294)

6 months
3 (#984,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Regarding the pain of others.Susan Sontag - 2003 - Diogène 201 (1):127-.
Images and Emotion in Abortion Debates.Catherine Mills - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):61-62.
The persuasive power of brain scan images.Carl Senior - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):60 – 61.
Bioethics in this visual century.Nora L. Jones - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):57 – 58.
Visual bioethics: Seeing is believing?Barbara Chubak - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):58 – 60.

Add more references