Science and Hypothesis: Historical Essays on Scientific Methodology

Springer (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This book consists of a collection of essays written between 1965 and 1981. Some have been published elsewhere; others appear here for the first time. Although dealing with different figures and different periods, they have a common theme: all are concerned with examining how the method of hy pothesis came to be the ruling orthodoxy in the philosophy of science and the quasi-official methodology of the scientific community. It might have been otherwise. Barely three centuries ago, hypothetico deduction was in both disfavor and disarray. Numerous rival methods for scientific inquiry - including eliminative and enumerative induction, analogy and derivation from first principles - were widely touted. The method of hypothesis, known since antiquity, found few proponents between 1700 and 1850. During the last century, of course, that ordering has been inverted and - despite an almost universal acknowledgement of its weaknesses - the method of hypothesis (usually under such descriptions as 'hypothetico deduction' or 'conjectures and refutations') has become the orthodoxy of the 20th century. Behind the waxing and waning of the method of hypothesis, embedded within the vicissitudes of its fortunes, there is a fascinating story to be told. It is a story that forms an integral part of modern science and its philosophy.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science and Hypothesis. [REVIEW]Thomas V. Upton - 1985 - Review of Metaphysics 38 (3):653-655.
Discourse on method, and related writings.René Descartes - 1999 - New York: Penguin Books. Edited by Desmond M. Clarke.
Induction. [REVIEW]Michael Heller - 1983 - Review of Metaphysics 37 (2):416-417.
Waves and Scientific Method.Peter Achinstein - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:193 - 204.
Methodological pluralism, normative naturalism and the realist aim of science.Howard Sankey - 2000 - In Howard Sankey & Robert Nola (eds.), After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 211-229.
Scientific method.James Kern Feibleman - 1972 - The Hague,: M. Nijhoff.


Added to PP

29 (#569,467)

6 months
6 (#587,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Larry Laudan
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis.Felipe Romero - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (11):e12633.
Exploratory experiments.L. R. Franklin - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):888-899.
Beyond divorce: Current status of the discovery debate.Thomas Nickles - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):177-206.
Fix it and be damned: A reply to Laudan.John Worrall - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):376-388.

View all 82 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references