The decades immediately following the Second World War saw extensive interest in the literary novels of Sade. Compared with the Sade studies of Maurice Blanchot, Jacques Lacan, and Gilles Deleuze, Simone de Beauvoir offers a unique perspective in her essay Must We Burn De Sade?. Indeed, unlike her contemporaries, Beauvoir focuses not only on Sade's prose but also on Sade's life and the relationship between Sade's life and literature. The latter is interpreted in two different ways. Thus, Beauvoir uses at least three different perspectives to understand the Marquis de Sade. In our essay, each of these three approaches, not clearly distinguished by Beauvoir's interpreters, will be discussed separately. This discussion will be linked to the important point that Beauvoir mentions three different notions of sadistic enjoyment. It will be argued that the distinction between these different notions coincides with the distinction between the three perspectives Beauvoir uses in her reading of Sade. We will evaluate both how Beauvoir's study on Sade is related to her existentialist philosophy, and the relationship between Must We Burn De Sade? and the studies of Beauvoir's contemporaries, a relationship which is neglected by most scholars in continental philosophy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
DOI 10.1080/00071773.2014.919123
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,491
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

4 Beauvoir and Merleau-Ponty on Ambiguity.Monika Langer - 2003 - In Claudia Card (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Cambridge University Press. pp. 87.
Reading Simone de Beauvoir with Martin Heidegger.Eva Gothlin - 2003 - In Claudia Card (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Cambridge University Press. pp. 45--65.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pierre Klossowski Reads Marquis de Sade. Modernity and Salvation (Forthcoming).Lode Lauwaert - forthcoming - Bijdragen: Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie En Theologie.
Simone de Beauvoir and the Marquis de Sade.Debra Bergoffen - 2012 - In Shannon M. Mussett & William S. Wilkerson (eds.), Beauvoir and Western Thought From Plato to Butler. pp. 75.
Simone de Beauvoir Over Leven En Werk van Markies de Sade.Lode Lauwaert - 2011 - de Uil van Minerva: Tijdschrift Voor Geschiedenis En Wijsbegeerte van de Cultuur 24 (4):211-224.
Political Writings.Simone de Beauvoir, Margaret A. Simons & Marybeth Timmermann (eds.) - 2012 - University of Illinois Press.
The Marquis de Sade and Induced Abortion.A. D. Farr - 1980 - Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (1):7-10.
Beauvoir on Sade: Making Sexuality Into an Ethic.Judith Butler - 2003 - In Claudia Card (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Cambridge University Press. pp. 168--88.
Pierre Klossowski Reads Sade Theologically. Modernity and Salvation.Lode Lauwaert - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 74 (3):174-182.
Is Sade a philosopher of Enlightenment?Michel Brix - 2007 - Trans/Form/Ação 30 (2):11-22.


Added to PP index

Total views
24 ( #423,611 of 2,381,244 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #372,381 of 2,381,244 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes