Studies on social influence bring us to fear that influence may alienate us and turn us into an agent of the will and desire of the other. This fear relies on a representation of the relationship of influence: it would be an asymmetrical relationship involving two basically opposite and complementary entities, the source and the target .If some experiments in social psychology demonstrate the effectiveness of some techniques of influence and manipulation, they must however be analysed in detail. Many experiments and theories show that influence is not basically nonreciprocal. These works are neglected because they are too different from the imaginary representation of influence that dominates both social psychology and common sense
Keywords Social influence  Social representations  Submission  Imaginary  Manipulation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00348.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,172
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Introduction to Social Psychology.William K. Wright - 1912 - Philosophical Review 21:242.
The General Theory of Employment.John Maynard Keynes - 1937 - Quarterly Journal of Economics 51:209-223.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
24 ( #475,749 of 2,517,823 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #79,287 of 2,517,823 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes