The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 32:54-61 (1998)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
I try to clarify the ways in which one would seek to hold that language and/or thought are public. For each of these theses, I distinguish four forms in which they can be framed, and two ways of establishing them. The first will try to make the publicity of thought follow from that of language; the second will try to make the publicity of language follow from that of thought. I show that none of these strategies can do without the thesis that language and thought are interdependent, and that even while admitting this thesis, the second strategy presents more difficulties than the first.
|
Keywords | Conference Proceedings Contemporary Philosophy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 9781634350518 |
DOI | 10.5840/wcp20-paideia199832539 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
La Publicité Et L’Interdépendance du Langage Et de la Pensée.Daniel Laurier - 2004 - Dialogue 43 (2):281-315.
Regress Arguments Against the Language of Thought.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 1997 - Analysis 57 (1):60-66.
Why is Thought Linguistic? Ockham's Two Conceptions of the Intellect.Martin Lenz - 2008 - Vivarium 46 (3):302-317.
Language, Thought, and the Language of Thought (Aunty's Own Argument Revisited).Martin Davies - 1998 - In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (eds.), Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 226.
Understanding the Language of Thought.John L. Pollock - 1990 - Philosophical Studies 58 (1-2):95-120.
Concepts, Connectionism, and the Language of Thought.Martin Davies - 1991 - In W Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 485-503.
Where the Regress Argument Still Goes Wrong: Reply to Knowles.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 1999 - Analysis 59 (4):321-327.
No Conceptual Thought Without Language.Christopher Gauker - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):687-687.
Thought, Language, and the Argument From Explicitness.Agustín Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (3):381–401.
Thought, Language, and Animals.Hans-Johann Glock - 2006 - In Michael Kober (ed.), Grazer Philosophische Studien. Rodopi. pp. 139-160.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-12-22
Total views
72 ( #161,524 of 2,518,715 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,715 )
2010-12-22
Total views
72 ( #161,524 of 2,518,715 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,070 of 2,518,715 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads