Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (4):355-377 (2020)

Authors
Ben Laurence
University of Chicago
Abstract
In non-ideal theory, the political philosopher seeks to identify an injustice, synthesize social scientific work to diagnose its underlying causes, and propose morally permissible and potentially efficacious remedies. This paper explores the role in non-ideal theory of the identification of a plausible agent of change who might bring about the proposed remedies. I argue that the question of the agent of change is connected with the other core tasks of diagnosing injustice and proposing practical remedies. In this connection, I criticize two linked postures that nonideal theorists sometimes adopt: a technocratic mode of neutral policy recommendation, whereby philosophers say what “we” must do to address some problem, without attending to the way agency enters the problem and its possible resolution; and the tendency to treat non-ideal theory as primarily consisting int eh enumeration of duties we are failing to fulfill, and specification of who is under what additional duties in light of this shortfall. My argument is that these tendencies fail to register in a coherent way the practical character of political philosophy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jopp.12204
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Activist‐Led Education and Egalitarian Social Change.Cain Shelley - 2021 - Wiley: Journal of Political Philosophy 29 (4):456-479.
Beyond “Ought Implies Feasible”.Jürgen Sirsch - 2021 - Metaphilosophy 52 (2):280-301.
The Agents of Justice.Colin Hickey, Tim Meijers, Ingrid Robeyns & Dick Timmer - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (10):e12770.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Problems with Persistence.Nicholas Asher - 1994 - Topoi 13 (1):37-49.
Why Are You Betraying Your Class?Avishai Margalit - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):171-183.
The Representation of Action.Anton Ford - 2017 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 80:217-233.
Rational Resolve.Richard Holton - 2004 - Philosophical Review 113 (4):507-535.
"Ought" and the Perspective of the Agent.Benjamin Kiesewitter - 2011 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (3):1-24.
Desire.Philip Pettit - 1998 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Regretful Decisions and Climate Change.Rebecca Livernois - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (2):168-191.
A Model of Non-Informational Preference Change.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical Politics 23 (2):145-164.
When Do Introspection Axioms Matter for Multi-Agent Epistemic Reasoning?Wesley H. Holliday, Yifeng Ding & Cedegao Zhang - 2019 - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 297:121–139.
NO Revision and NO Contraction.Gregory Wheeler & Marco Alberti - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (3):411-430.
Action, Movement, and Neurophysiology.Don Locke - 1974 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1-4):23 – 42.
Because I Want It.Stephen Darwall - 2001 - Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2):129-153.
Belief Change for Introspective Agents.Sten Lindström & Wlodek Rabinowicz - 1999 - Spinning Ideas, Electronic Essays Dedicated to Peter Gärdenfors on His Fiftieth Birthday.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-25

Total views
20 ( #540,263 of 2,454,627 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #143,490 of 2,454,627 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes