We have modified Aristotelian syllogistic logic in for use in introductory philosophy courses. Although the scope of Aristotle's syllogistic is narrowed by our modifications, its pedagogical value is increased in one crucial way: in 4-6 hours of class time, students with no background in argumentation progress to the point where they can evaluate the structure of condensed and extended arguments. Because the mechanics of the program are readily grasped, it is possible to focus class time on important, abstract notions such as validity, soundness, relevance, etc. If successfully implemented, the program encourages good habits for analysing, assessing and formulating arguments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,554
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Introduction.C. L. Hardin - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (4):327-331.
Building a High School Philosophy Program.Sean A. Riley - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (3):239-252.
A System of Argumentation Forms in Aristotle.Simon Wolf - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (1):19-40.
Nonstandard Runs And Program Verification.Laszlo Csirmaz - 1981 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 10 (2):68-77.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #719,901 of 2,331,156 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #397,060 of 2,331,156 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes