Should we abandon optimization theory? The need for bounded rationality

Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (3):395-426 (2000)
This paper makes explicit the rhetoric of optimization. Various arguments are examined, in order to determine whether we should retain optimization theory or assume bounded rationality. Empirical evidence confounds optimization theory; in the face of experimental studies, an empirical dilemma emerges, according to which we should discard either the theory of expected utility or the criterion of empirical refutation. Methodological criticisms attack optimization theory's epistemological status; together, they give rise to a methodological trilemma, according to which optimization theory is indeterminate, unfalsifiable or tautological. Methodological defences seem to protect optimization theory against criticism; but a more careful examination shows that either they involve logical defects or they rest upon a conceptual gap. Theoretical difficulties plague optimization theory; though various extensions have been proposed, optimization theory entails a theoretical dilemma, according to which one must choose between unrealistic environment and unrealistic abilities. Should we abandon optimization theory? The leading question will be answered in the affirmative: optimization theory should be abandoned and bounded rationality should be assumed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/135017800453751
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Wiley Publications in Statistics.
On Ethics and Economics.Amartya Sen - 1989 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 51 (4):722-723.
Ulysses and the Sirens.Jon Elster - 1986 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1):82-95.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Varieties of Instrumental Rationality.Stephen Ellis - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):199-220.
Anger and Economic Rationality.Daniel John Zizzo - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (2):147-167.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Does Optimization Imply Rationality?Philippe Mongin - 2000 - Synthese 124 (1-2):73 - 111.
Optimization and Improvement. [REVIEW]Paul Weirich - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (3):467 - 475.
Rationality and Economic Behavior.Daniel R. Fusfeld - 1996 - Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (2):307-315.
Maynard Smith, Optimization, and Evolution.Sahotra Sarkar - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (5):951-966.
Constrained Multiple Goal Optimization as a Theory of the Firm.Duane Windsor - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:283-288.
Bidirectional Optimization From Reasoning and Learning in Games.Michael Franke & Gerhard Jäger - 2012 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (1):117-139.
Some Notes on the Formal Properties of Bidirectional Optimality Theory.Gerhard Jäger - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (4):427-451.
Sleep is Optimizing.Thomas L. Clarke - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):66-67.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
20 ( #256,184 of 2,202,425 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,061 of 2,202,425 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature