What doctors should call their patients

Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):129-131 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper discusses the moral difficulties physicians encounter when determining the level of formality they will use when addressing their patients. It is argued that physicians ought not to use a patient's first name unless the patient also uses the physician's first name. In short, physicians and patients should always address each other with the same level of formality. It is argued that this is so even when patients invite physicians to address them informally.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The real problem with equipoise.Winston Chiong - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):37 – 47.
The patient's duty to adhere to prescribed treatment: An ethical analysis.David B. Resnik - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):167 – 188.
Patient autonomy, paternalism, and the conscientious physician.Stephen Wear - 1983 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 4 (3).
Why Physicians Ought to Lie for Their Patients.Nicolas Tavaglione & Samia Hurst - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (3):4-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
58 (#264,822)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Lavin
Stanford University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Ethical obligation arising from routine screening.V. Warren - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1):54-55.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references