Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician survey

Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):214-218 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Background: Patient autonomy has been promoted as the most important principle to guide difficult clinical decisions. To examine whether practising physicians indeed value patient autonomy above other considerations, physicians were asked to weight patient autonomy against three other criteria that often influence doctors’ decisions. Associations between physicians’ religious characteristics and their weighting of the criteria were also examined. Methods: Mailed survey in 2007 of a stratified random sample of 1000 US primary care physicians, selected from the American Medical Association masterfile. Physicians were asked how much weight should be given to the following: (1) the patient’s expressed wishes and values, (2) the physician’s own judgment about what is in the patient’s best interest, (3) standards and recommendations from professional medical bodies and (4) moral guidelines from religious traditions. Results: Response rate 51% (446/879). Half of physicians (55%) gave the patient’s expressed wishes and values “the highest possible weight”. In comparative analysis, 40% gave patient wishes more weight than the other three factors, and 13% ranked patient wishes behind some other factor. Religious doctors tended to give less weight to the patient’s expressed wishes. For example, 47% of doctors with high intrinsic religious motivation gave patient wishes the “highest possible weight”, versus 67% of those with low (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3 to 0.8). Conclusions: Doctors believe patient wishes and values are important, but other considerations are often equally or more important. This suggests that patient autonomy does not guide physicians’ decisions as much as is often recommended in the ethics literature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Patient Autonomy in Emergency Medicine.Anne-Cathrine Naess, Reidun Foerde & Petter Andreas Steen - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):71-77.
The Irreducibly Clinical Character of Bioethics.Stephen Wear - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (1):53-70.
Physician and Patient: Respect for Mutuality.David Gary Smith & Lisa H. Newton - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Promoting Patient Autonomy: Looking Back.Gene H. Stollerman - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
The Doctor–Patient Relationship.Harry H. Gordon - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (3):243-256.
The Professional Autonomy of the Medical Doctor in Italy.Dario Sacchini & Leonardo Antico - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5):441-456.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
28 (#412,831)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?