Commentary: Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Are the Cases Wrong? Lawrence J. Schneiderman


Abstract
Howard Brody expresses concern that citing the “two cases that put futility on the map,” namely Helga Wanglie and Baby K, may be providing ammunition to the opponents of the concept of medical futility. He in fact joins well-known opponents of the concept of medical futility in arguing that it is one thing for the physician to say whether a particular intervention will promote an identified goal, quite another to say whether a goal is worth pursuing. In the latter instance, physicians are laying themselves open “to the criticism of taking on basic value judgments that are more appropriately left to patients and their surrogates.” Brody states that in both the Wanglie and Baby K cases, the “basic value judgments” had to do with the worthiness of maintaining unconscious life via medical technology. He classifies this as “a question of professional integrity—but not a question of futility,” adding that “more than semantics hinges on this distinction.” The “more than semantics” factor is a pragmatic, even political one. Failure to make this distinction renders physicians “that much more suspect and less trustworthy in the public debate.”
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0963180198223085
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,822
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Medicalization of Life.Lawrence J. Schneiderman - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (2):191-197.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Don't Use the Wrong Cases.Howard Brody - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):269-273.
Judging Who Should Live: Schneiderman and Jecker on the Duty Not to Treat.William Harper - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):500 – 515.
Medical Futility: The Duty Not to Treat.Nancy S. Jecker & Lawrence J. Schneiderman - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (2):151.
Defining Medical Futility and Improving Medical Care.Lawrence Schneiderman - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):123-131.
The Perils of Hope.Lawrence J. Schneiderman - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (2):235-239.
The Media and the Medical Market.Lawrence J. Schneiderman - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (4):420.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
53 ( #156,113 of 2,265,167 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #858,325 of 2,265,167 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature