Authors
Insa Lawler
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Abstract
To what end should or do we pursue philosophy and how? Meta-philosophical questions along these lines have gained more and more interest recently. The collected volume "Erkenntnistheorie — Wie und wozu?" (Engl.: "Epistemology — How and to what end?") aspires to raise and tackle issues addressing the meta-epistemological questions "How is epistemology practiced and to what end?". Although this aim sounds like a descriptive meta-epistemological endeavor, it is not surprising that many authors rather argue for normative claims surrounding the questions "How and to what end should epistemology be pursued?". This review provides an overview on the collected volume and offers a critical evaluation of its overall achievement.
Keywords Epistemology  Meta-epistemology  Meta-philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10838-016-9349-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Bayesian Epistemology.Luc Bovens & Stephan Hartmann - 2003 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knowing How.Jason Stanley & Timothy Willlamson - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (8):411-444.
Understanding Why.Alison Hills - 2015 - Noûs 49 (2):661-688.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Erkenntnistheorie: Wie Und Wozu?Stefan Tolksdorf & Dirk Koppleberg (eds.) - forthcoming - Mentis Publishers.
Recent Work on Naturalized Epistemology.James Maffie - 1990 - American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (4):281 - 293.
Meta-Ontology.Peter van Inwagen - 1998 - Erkenntnis 48:233-250.
``Meta-Ethics and Meta-Epistemology&Quot.William Alston - 1978 - In A. I. Goldman & I. Kim (eds.), Values and Morals. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 275-97.
Meta-Ethics and Meta-Epistemology.William P. Alston - 1978 - In A. I. Goldman & I. Kim (eds.), Values and Morals. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 275--297.
Meta-Conceivability.Philip Corkum - 2012 - Essays in Philosophy 13 (1):12.
Moral Epistemology.Peter Tramel - 2005 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Was Macht Eine Erkenntnistheorie Naturalistisch?On What Makes an Epistemology Naturalistic.Dirk Koppelberg - 1996 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27 (1):71-90.
Meta-Externalism Vs Meta-Internalism in the Study of Reference.Daniel Cohnitz & Jussi Haukioja - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (3):475-500.
A Dilemma for Naturalized Epistemology?Shane Oakley - 2011 - In Michael Shaffer & Michael Veber (eds.), What Place for the A Priori? Open Court. pp. 157.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-07-05

Total views
74 ( #148,948 of 2,462,436 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,366 of 2,462,436 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes