Res Publica 24 (3):319-338 (2018)

Authors
Holly Lawford-Smith
University of Melbourne
Abstract
Do consumers’ ordinary actions of purchasing certain goods make them complicit in global labour injustice? To establish that they do, two things much be shown. First, it must be established that they are not more than complicit, for example that they are not the principal perpetrators. Second, it must be established that they meet the conditions for complicity on a plausible account. I argue that Kutz’s account faces an objection that makes Lepora and Goodin’s better suited, and defend the idea that consumers are complicit in at least two of the ways distinguished by the latter. In the final section of the paper, I consider whether consumers’ responsibility for complicity in global labour injustice is likely to be as strong as responsibility from another source, namely benefiting from that injustice.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-017-9355-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,687
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Do I Make a Difference?Shelly Kagan - 2011 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (2):105-141.
What 'We'?Holly Lawford-Smith - 2015 - Journal of Social Ontology 1 (2):225-250.
Consequentialism and the Problem of Collective Harm: A Reply to Kagan.Julia Nefsky - 2011 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (4):364-395.
Harm and Its Moral Significance.Seana Valentine Shiffrin - 2012 - Legal Theory 18 (3):357-398.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Are ‘the Affluent’ Responsible for Global Poverty?Holly Lawford-Smith - 2019 - Ethics and Global Politics 12 (1):61-67.
Participation and Superfluity.Jan Willem Wieland & Rutger van Oeveren - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (2):163-187.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Ethical Are Ethical Purchasing Policies?Don Wells - 2004 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):119-140.
Human Rights: Sometimes One Thought Too Many?Simon Hope - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (1):111-126.
Unethical Consumption & Obligations to Signal.Holly Lawford-Smith - 2015 - Ethics and International Affairs 29 (3):315-330.
Strukturelle Entfremdung als Kategorie der Wirtschaftsethik.Tim Henning - 2012 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 60 (2):213-226.
Exploitation Via Labour Power in Marx.Henry Laycock - 1999 - The Journal of Ethics 3 (2):121--131.
Aesthetic Consumption.Josetta S. McLaughlin & Raed Elaydi - 2012 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 23:251-260.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-09

Total views
98 ( #105,484 of 2,432,283 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #138,513 of 2,432,283 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes