AbstractThe question of whether there are laws in ecology is important for a number of reasons. If, as some have suggested, there are no ecological laws, this would seem to distinguish ecology from other branches of science, such as physics. It could also make a difference to the methodology of ecology. If there are no laws to be discovered, ecologists would seem to be in the business of merely supplying a suite of useful models. These models would need to be assessed for their empirical adequacy but not for their ability to capture fundamental truths, or the like. If, on the other hand, ecology does have laws, this prompts further questions about what these laws are and why even the best candidates for ecological laws fall short of what might be expected of laws
Similar books and articles
Causal and Mechanistic Explanations in Ecology.Jani Raerinne - 2010 - Acta Biotheoretica 59 (3):251-271.
In defense of psychological laws.Martin Carrier - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):217 – 232.
Ceteris paribus laws: Classification and deconstruction. [REVIEW]Gerhard Schurz - 2002 - Erkenntnis 57 (3):351Ð372.
Laws of biology, laws of nature: Problems and (dis)solutions.Andrew Hamilton - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (3):592–610.
A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu's Spirit of Laws: Prepared for Press From the Original.Comte Antoine Louis Claude Destutt de Tracy - 1811 - Lawbook Exchange.
Generalizations in ecology: A philosophical taxonomy. [REVIEW]Gregory Cooper - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (4):555-586.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads