Is Aristotle's Function Argument Fallacious? Part 1, Groundwork

Philosophical Inquiry 31 (1-2):191-224 (2009)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Ancient Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1105-235X
DOI 10.5840/philinquiry2009311/221
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,767
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Role of Welfare in Eudaimonism.Anne Baril - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):511-535.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Aristotle's Argument for a Human Function.Rachel Barney - 2008 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34:293-322.
What is a Sophistical Refutation?David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):213-232.
Fallacies of Accident.David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):267-289.
The Function of the Function Argument.Gavin Lawrence - 2001 - Ancient Philosophy 21 (2):445-475.
On Ockham's Way Out.Alvin Plantinga - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):235-269.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-09-18

Total downloads

78 ( #63,921 of 2,146,925 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

13 ( #51,581 of 2,146,925 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums