Incompatibilism and the garden of forking paths

Philosophical Issues 33 (1):110-123 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Let (leeway) incompatibilism be the thesis that causal determinism is incompatible with the freedom to do otherwise. Several prominent authors have claimed that incompatibilism alone can capture, or at least best captures, the intuitive appeal behind Jorge Luis Borges's famous “Garden of Forking Paths” metaphor. The thought, briefly, is this: the “single path” leading up to one's present decision represents the past; the forking paths that one must decide between represent those possible futures consistent with the past and the laws of nature. But if determinism is true, there is only one possible future consistent with the past and the laws and, hence, only one path to choose from. That is, if determinism is true, then we are not free to do otherwise. In this paper, I argue that this understanding of the Garden of Forking Paths faces a number of problems and ought to be rejected even by incompatibilists. I then present an alternative understanding that not only avoids these problems but still supports incompatibilism. Finally, I consider how various versions of (leeway) compatibilism fit with the Garden of Forking Paths as well as the broader question of whether metaphors, however intuitive, have any dialectical force in the debates over freedom.

Similar books and articles

Truth in the Garden of Forking Paths.John MacFarlane - 2008 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 81--102.
The Forking Paths Model and the No Constraints Model of Freedom and Moral Responsibility. 이희열 - 2017 - Journal of the New Korean Philosophical Association 90:381-401.
Stable Forking and Imaginaries.Enrique Casanovas & Joris Potier - 2018 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (4):497-502.
Forking and dividing in fields with several orderings and valuations.Will Johnson - 2022 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (1):2150025.
Compatibilism and Incompatibilism in Social Cognition.John Turri - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S3):403-424.
The stable forking conjecture and generic structures.Massoud Pourmahdian - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (5):415-421.
The stable forking conjecture and generic structures.Massoud Pourmahdian - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (5):415-421.
Forking and Dividing in Henson Graphs.Gabriel Conant - 2017 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (4):555-566.


Added to PP

235 (#76,677)

6 months
187 (#11,645)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Law
Universität Hannover

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Essay on Free Will.Peter Van Inwagen - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David K. Lewis - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):145-152.
Why Free Will is Real.Christian List - 2019 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Causation and Free Will.Carolina Sartorio - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 29 references / Add more references