Mining Arguments From 19th Century Philosophical Texts Using Topic Based Modelling

In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining. Baltimore, USA: pp. 79-87 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we look at the manual analysis of arguments and how this compares to the current state of automatic argument analysis. These considerations are used to develop a new approach combining a machine learning algorithm to extract propositions from text, with a topic model to determine argument structure. The results of this method are compared to a manual analysis.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argumentation mining.Raquel Mochales & Marie-Francine Moens - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):1-22.
Data mining: Proprietary rights, people and proposals.Dinah Payne & Cherie Courseault Trumbach - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (3):241-252.
Event Mining Through Clustering.T. V. Geetha & E. Umamaheswari - 2014 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 23 (1):59-73.
Proof Mining in Topological Dynamics.Philipp Gerhardy - 2008 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (4):431-446.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-22

Downloads
606 (#24,645)

6 months
67 (#58,153)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Colin Allen
University of Pittsburgh
David Bourget
University of Western Ontario
Andrew Ravenscroft
University of East London

References found in this work

Argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Add more references