Taurek, numbers and probabilities

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):149 - 166 (2006)
Abstract
In his paper, “Should the Numbers Count?" John Taurek imagines that we are in a position such that we can either save a group of five people, or we can save one individual, David. We cannot save David and the five. This is because they each require a life-saving drug. However, David needs all of the drug if he is to survive, while the other five need only a fifth each.Typically, people have argued as if there was a choice to be made: either numbers matter, in which case we should save the greater number, or numbers don't matter, but rather there is moral value in giving each person an equal chance of survival, and therefore we should toss a coin. My claim is that we do not have to make a choice in this way. Rather, numbers do matter, but it doesn't follow that we should always save the greater number. And likewise, there is moral value in giving each person an equal chance of survival, but it doesn't follow that we should always toss a coin.
Keywords aggregation  numbers  probabilities  saving lives  Taurek  weighing goods
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-005-9004-4
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Should the Numbers Count?John M. Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
Innumerate Ethics.Derek Parfit - 1978 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (4):285-301.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Taurek's No Worse Claim.Weyma Lübbe - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (1):69–85.
Giving Each Person Her Due: Taurek Cases and Non-Comparative Justice.Alan Thomas - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):661-676.
The New Problem of Numbers in Morality.Fiona Woollard - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):631-641.
Numbers Scepticism, Equal Chances and Pluralism.Gerald Lang & Rob Lawlor - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (3):298-315.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Should the Probabilities Count?Katharina Rasmussen - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (2):205-218.
The Distribution of Numbers and the Comprehensiveness of Reasons.Véronique Munoz-Dardé - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (2):207–233.
The Distribution of Numbers and the Comprehensiveness of Reason.Veronique Munoz-Darde - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (2):207-233.
Why the Numbers Should Sometimes Count.John T. Sanders - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (1):3-14.
The Mixed Solution to the Number Problem.Martin Peterson - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):166-177.
Aggregation and Two Moral Methods.F. M. Kamm - 2005 - Utilitas 17 (1):1-23.
What Is Wrong With Kamm's and Scanlon's Arguments Against Taurek.Tyler Doggett - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (3).
Should the Numbers Count?John M. Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

140 ( #33,591 of 2,164,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #50,899 of 2,164,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums