Authors
Holly Lawford-Smith
University of Melbourne
Abstract
The central question of the paper is: do women have the right to exclude transwomen from women-only spaces? First I argue that biological sex matters politically, and should be protected legally—at least until such a time as there is no longer sex discrimination. Then I turn to the rationales for women-only spaces, arguing that there are eight independent rationales that together overdetermine the moral justification for maintaining particular spaces as women-only. I address a package of spaces, including prisons, changing rooms, fitting rooms, bathrooms, shelters, rape and domestic violence refuges, gyms, spas, sports, schools, accommodations, shortlists, prizes, quotas, political groups, clubs, events, festivals, and terms. The arguments of these two sections taken together make a strong case against self-identification as the basis for legal sex (because legal sex will generally determine inclusion). In the last part of the paper, I address the objection that my conclusion was obtained through linguistic sleight of hand, which I answer by saying that choices about how to refer to transwomen don’t change the underlying fact that the basis for exclusion is generally sex, not gender identity.
Keywords Gender critical feminism  Radical feminism  Women-only spaces  Transwomen  Right to exclude  Ethics of immigration
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Are women adult human females?Alex Byrne - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (12):3783-3803.
What Is Really Wrong With Compelled Association?Seana Valentine Shiffrin - 2005 - Northwestern University Law Review 99 (2):839-888.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Feminist Views of Action Sports.Holly Thorpe - 2018 - In Louise Mansfield, Jayne Caudwell, Belinda Wheaton & Beccy Watson (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Feminism and Sport, Leisure and Physical Education. Palgrave Macmillan Uk. pp. 699-719.
Diasporic Feminism and Locating Women in Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni’s Arranged Marriage.Bhagyashri Shrimant Pawar - 2019 - In GRFDT Research Monograph 51, Vol 5, Number 3, March 2019. New Delhi, India: GRFDT Research Forum. pp. 4-13.
On the Politics of Coalition.Elena Ruíz & Kristie Dotson - 2017 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 3 (2):1-16.
‘Disempowered by Nature’: Spinoza on The Political Capabilities of Women.Beth Lord - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1085 - 1106.
Feminism, Gender and Representation.Derya Aybakan Saliya - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 10:147-151.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-01-17

Total views
1,135 ( #4,594 of 2,462,435 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
388 ( #984 of 2,462,435 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes