Danielle A. Layne
Gonzaga University
With regard to the theme “Reason in context,” the following stimulates a discussion on both Plato’s Socrates and the culpability of ignorance. By focusingon Plato’s Lysis, Alcibiades I, Philebus, and the Laws, I debunk the typical interpretation of Socratic moral intellectualism by evidencing that though there are various forms of ignorance in the Platonic dialogues, only one leads to shame-worthy error. Furthermore, in this endeavour to understand the “hierarchy” of ignorance in Plato, I take an unusual path and jump from Antiquity to the Renaissance by connecting Plato’s Socrates to Erasmus’s Folly. By comparing these characters I show how both only condemn double ignorance, i.e., ignorance of ignorance joined with the pretence to knowledge. Ultimately, by analyzing this particularly heinous form of ignorance, I question whether in all periods and circumstances feigned wisdom more than “mere ignorance” leads to shame and disrepute
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Conference Proceedings  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0065-7638
DOI 10.5840/acpaproc20098320
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Involuntary Evil and the Socratic Problem of Double Ignorance in Proclus.Danielle A. Layne - 2015 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 9 (1):27-53.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Power Of Ignorance.Lorraine Code - 2004 - Philosophical Papers 33 (3):291-308.
Ignorance: How It Drives Science.Stuart Firestein - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
In Praise of Ignorance.L. L. Farrar - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (3-4):339-346.
What is Ignorance?Rik Peels - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (1):57-67.
On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels.Pierre LeMorvan - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (2):335-344.
Refutation and Double Ignorance in Proclus.Danielle A. Layne - 2009 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):347-362.


Added to PP index

Total views
55 ( #208,455 of 2,519,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,671 of 2,519,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes