Ethics 127 (3):579-609 (2017)

Authors
Seth Lazar
Australian National University
Abstract
Deontologists have long been upbraided for lacking an account of justified decision- making under risk and uncertainty. One response is to develop a deontological decision theory—a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for an act’s being permissible given an agent’s imperfect information. In this article, I show that deontologists can make more use of regular decision theory than some might have thought, but that we must adapt decision theory to accommodate agent- centered options—permissions to favor or sacrifice our own interests, when doing so is overall morally worse. Accommodating options requires more than just amend- ing the decision-theoretic ‘value function’. We must change the decision rule as well.
Keywords deontology  agent-centred options  supererogation  risk
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/690069
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Opting for the Best: Oughts and Options.Douglas W. Portmore - 2019 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
In Dubious Battle: Uncertainty and the Ethics of Killing.Seth Lazar - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (4):859-883.
Moral Uncertainty for Deontologists.Christian Tarsney - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (3):505-520.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Decision Maker's Options.Paul Weirich - 1983 - Philosophical Studies 44 (2):175 - 186.
Are Moral Reasons Morally Overriding?Douglas W. Portmore - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (4):369-388.
Taking Seriously the Challenges of Agent-Centered Morality.Hye-Ryoung Kang - 2011 - JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL WONKWANG CULTURE 2 (1):43-56.
Are Plans Necessary?Michael McDermott - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (2):225-232.
Decision Theory and the Rationality of Further Deliberation.Igor Douven - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):303-328.
Epistemological Egoism and Agent-Centered Norms.Michael Huemer - 2011 - In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press. pp. 17.
La imposibilidad de un consecuencialismo moderado.Martin Farrell - 2000 - Análisis Filosófico 20 (1-2):7-32.
IIA, Rationality, and the Individuation of Options.Tina Rulli & Alex Worsnip - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (1):205-221.
Uncertainty, Indeterminacy, and Agent-Centred Constraints.Douglas W. Portmore - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (2):284-298.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-05

Total views
84 ( #131,659 of 2,461,941 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #88,036 of 2,461,941 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes