Internists' attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care

Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):499 (2004)
Objective: To describe the frequency of support for terminal sedation among internists, determine whether support for terminal sedation is accompanied by support for physician assisted suicide , and explore characteristics of internists who support terminal sedation but not assisted suicide.Design: A statewide, anonymous postal survey.Setting: Connecticut, USA.Participants: 677 Connecticut members of the American College of Physicians.Measurements: Attitudes toward terminal sedation and assisted suicide; experience providing primary care to terminally ill patients; demographic and religious characteristics.Results: 78% of respondents believed that if a terminally ill patient has intractable pain despite aggressive analgesia, it is ethically appropriate to provide terminal sedation . Of those who favoured terminal sedation, 38% also agreed that PAS is ethically appropriate in some circumstances. Along a three point spectrum of aggressiveness in end of life care, the plurality of respondents were in the middle, agreeing with terminal sedation but not with PAS. Compared with respondents who were less aggressive or more aggressive, physicians in this middle group were more likely to report having more experience providing primary care to terminally ill patients and attending religious services more frequently .Conclusions: Support for terminal sedation was widespread in this population of physicians, and most who agreed with terminal sedation did not support PAS. Most internists who support aggressive palliation appear likely to draw an ethical line between terminal sedation and assisted suicide
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2003.004895
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,165
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Terminal Sedation: An Emotional Decision in End-of-Life Care.S. N. Etkind - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):508-509.
End-of-Life Ethics: A Case Study Approach.Kenneth J. Doka (ed.) - 2012 - Hospice Foundation of America.
Medical Ethics and Double Effect: The Case of Terminal Sedation.Joseph Boyle - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):51-60.
The Double Life of Double Effect.Alison McIntyre - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):61-74.
End-of-Life Care: Ethics and Law.Joan McCarthy (ed.) - 2011 - Cork University Press.
Terminal Sedation as Palliative Care: Revalidating a Right to a Good Death.George P. Smith - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):382-387.
Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care.Mary Ann Baily - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):172-182.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

9 ( #463,889 of 2,171,994 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,994 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums