Princeton University Press (2005)
Gabriel Richardson Lear presents a bold new approach to one of the enduring debates about Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: the controversy about whether it coherently argues that the best life for humans is one devoted to a single activity, namely philosophical contemplation. Many scholars oppose this reading because the bulk of the Ethics is devoted to various moral virtues--courage and generosity, for example--that are not in any obvious way either manifestations of philosophical contemplation or subordinated to it. They argue that Aristotle was inconsistent, and that we should not try to read the entire Ethics as an attempt to flesh out the notion that the best life aims at the "monistic good" of contemplation. In defending the unity and coherence of the Ethics, Lear argues that, in Aristotle's view, we may act for the sake of an end not just by instrumentally bringing it about but also by approximating it. She then argues that, for Aristotle, the excellent rational activity of moral virtue is an approximation of theoretical contemplation. Thus, the happiest person chooses moral virtue as an approximation of contemplation in practical life. Richardson Lear bolsters this interpretation by examining three moral virtues--courage, temperance, and greatness of soul--and the way they are fine. Elegantly written and rigorously argued, this is a major contribution to our understanding of a central issue in Aristotle's moral philosophy
|Keywords||Aristotle Ethics, Ancient|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
"WHY BE MORAL?" The Cheng Brothers' Neo-Confucian Answer.Yong Huang - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):321-353.
An All-Inclusive Interpretation of Aristotle's Contemplative Life.Wei Liu - 2011 - Sophia 50 (1):57-71.
An Inconsistency in the Philebus?Joachim Aufderheide - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (5):817 - 837.
Similar books and articles
Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics – Gabriel Richardson Lear. [REVIEW]Catherine Osborne - 2007 - Philosophical Investigations 30 (1):92–96.
Gabriel Richardson Lear, Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's “Nicomachean Ethics”:Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's “Nicomachean Ethics.”.Pierre Destree - 2006 - Ethics 116 (3):597-600.
Review of Gabriel Richardson Lear, Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Princeton University Press, 2004). [REVIEW]John M. Armstrong - 2006 - Ancient Philosophy 26 (1):206–209.
Review: Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. [REVIEW]A. Kenny - 2006 - Mind 115 (460):1147-1150.
Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics.Iakovos Vasiliou - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy 104 (5):263-268.
On the Eudemian and Nicomachean Conceptions of Eudaimonia.Roopen Majithia - 2005 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):365-388.
Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Review).Charles M. Young - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):118-119.
Divine and Human Happiness in Nicomachean Ethics.Stephen S. Bush - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (1):49-75.
Practices of Reason: Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics.C. D. C. Reeve - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Aristotle on Well-Being and Intellectual Contemplation: David Charles.David Charles - 1999 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):205–223.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads116 ( #41,857 of 2,164,293 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #36,282 of 2,164,293 )
How can I increase my downloads?