A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles

Ethics and Information Technology 19 (2):107-115 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles must be programmed with procedures for dealing with trolley-style dilemmas where actions result in harm to either pedestrians or passengers. This paper outlines a Rawlsian algorithm as an alternative to the Utilitarian solution. The algorithm will gather the vehicle’s estimation of probability of survival for each person in each action, then calculate which action a self-interested person would agree to if he or she were in an original bargaining position of fairness. I will employ Rawls’ assumption that the Maximin procedure is what self-interested agents would use from an original position, and then show how the Maximin procedure can be operationalized to produce unique outputs over probabilities of survival.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Irresponsibilities, inequalities and injustice for autonomous vehicles.Hin-Yan Liu - 2017 - Ethics and Information Technology 19 (3):193-207.
Night Time Vehicle Detection.Iman A. Mohammed & Hasan Fleyeh - 2012 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 21 (2):143-165.
Rawlsian Theory and the Circumstances of Politics.Andrew Mason - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (5):658-683.
On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law.Henry Prakken - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (3):341-363.
From Robotics and Cypernetic Vehicles to Autonomous Systems: the organism lost and found.C. Emmeche - 2001 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal:159-187.
Responsibility Practices and Unmanned Military Technologies.Merel Noorman - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (3):809-826.
Stories, Exemplars, and Freedom.Keith Lehrer - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (1):1-17.
Content and Its vehicles in connectionist systems.Nicholas Shea - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (3):246–269.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-28

Downloads
140 (#91,588)

6 months
7 (#118,101)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Derek Leben
Carnegie Mellon University

References found in this work

Morals by Agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 2006 - In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Machine Ethics.Michael Anderson & Susan Leigh Anderson (eds.) - 2011 - Cambridge Univ. Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references