Fine's ways to fail to secure local realism


Authors
Soazig Le Bihan
University of Montana
Abstract
Since he proved his theorem in 1982, Fine has been challenging the traditional interpretation of the experimental violation of the Bell Inequalities (BI). A natural interpretation of Fine's theorem is that it provides us with an alternative set of assumptions on which to place blame for the failure of the BI, and opens to a new interpretation of the violation of the BI. Fine has a stronger interpretation for his theorem. He claims that his result undermines the traditional interpretation in terms of local realism. The aim of this paper is to understand and to assess Fine's claim. We distinguish three different strategies that Fine uses in order to support his view. We show that none of these strategies is successful. Fine fails to prove that local realism is not at stake in the violation of the BI by quantum phenomena.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.02.001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,780
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.Simon Kochen & E. P. Specker - 1967 - Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17:59--87.
Everett and Structure.David Wallace - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (1):87-105.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Arguing for the Natural Ontological Attitude.Joseph Rouse - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:294 - 301.
The Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science.Joseph Rouse - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):607-627.
Fine's Prism Models for Quantum Correlation Statistics.W. D. Sharp & N. Shanks - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (4):538-564.
Getting Ontologically Natural.Sami Pihlström - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):247-256.
The Fine-Tuning Argument.Neil A. Manson - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):271-286.
Critique of the Papers of Fine and Suppes.Abner Shimony - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:572 - 580.
Scientific Abstraction and the Realist Impulse.Martin Bunzl - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (3):449-456.
Fine-Tuning as Evidence for a Multiverse: Why White is Wrong. [REVIEW]Mark Douglas Saward - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):243-253.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-20

Total views
59 ( #139,527 of 2,265,034 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #860,568 of 2,265,034 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature