Experience and evidence

Husserl Studies 23 (3):229-246 (2007)

Abstract

It is the aim of this paper to assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence. In Sect. 1, I will summarize Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence. In Sect. 2, I will delineate Husserl’s concept of experience and in Sect. 3, I will try to define the concept of evidence in Husserl. In Sect. 4–6, I will assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concepts of evidence and show that Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence is out of the mark, since it is based on a total misunderstanding of Husserl’s concepts of evidence.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
81 (#146,671)

6 months
1 (#386,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nam-In Lee
Seoul National University

Citations of this work

Levels of the absolute in Husserl.Bence Peter Marosan - 2022 - Continental Philosophy Review 55 (2):137-158.

Add more citations