Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):401-414 (2008)

Abstract
In this response, we reiterate the importance of development (both ontogenetic and phylogenetic) in the understanding of a complex cognitive skill – analogical reasoning. Four key questions structure the response: Does relational priming exist, and is it sufficient for analogy? What do we mean by relations as transformations? Could all or any relations be represented as transformations? And what about the challenge of more complex analogies? In addressing these questions we bring together a number of supportive commentaries, strengthening our emergentist case for analogy (in particular with insights from comparative psychology), and review new supportive evidence. We also rebut those commentaries that ignore development at their peril. Along the way, we revisit the main assumptions underlying the analogy as relational priming (ARP) account of analogy, clarifying and elaborating as necessary
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X08004718
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,809
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thus Spake Zarathustra.Friedrich Nietzsche - 1911 - Dover Publications.
Component Processes in Analogical Reasoning.Robert J. Sternberg - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (4):353-378.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
7 ( #1,015,806 of 2,425,818 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #545,994 of 2,425,818 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes